In This Article
Quick-term landlords would possibly not have the ability to sh-sh-shake it off with regards to the extra taxes they could be accountable for. This follows the introduction of Rhode Island’s “Taylor Swift tax,” the nickname given to part-time residents who personal trip leases.
With different states following swimsuit, tensions are escalating between native municipalities, brokers, brokers, and the rich property house owners they symbolize.
What’s the Taylor Swift Tax?
The so-called Taylor Swift tax—formally often known as the Non-Proprietor-Occupied Property Tax Act—will take impact on July 1, 2026. It imposes an annual surcharge on non-primary residences (i.e., houses not occupied by their house owners or tenants for not less than 183 days a 12 months) that are valued at greater than $1 million.
The surcharge is ready at $2.50 for each $500 of assessed worth above that threshold. Utilizing these metrics, Kiplinger calculated {that a} $3 million property would face a surcharge of roughly $10,000 yearly, along with common property taxes.
The tax was named after the pop celebrity as a result of Swift bought a mansion within the upscale Watch Hill part of Rhode Island in 2013, the place she is a part-time resident. It’s estimated that she can be liable for an additional $136,000 yearly when the brand new tax takes impact.
Proponents and Opponents
The aim of the extra levy, in line with the state, is to elevate income that helps housing initiatives whereas lowering the variety of residences that stay vacant for a lot of the 12 months. Within the case of short-term landlords, this could possibly be devastating to their backside line, as they might not solely be taxed on the income they make as a landlord, but in addition from the Taylor Swift tax too, in the event that they lease the house for greater than 183 days a 12 months however not as a long-term rental.
The brand new tax has not been effectively acquired by many inside the true property business. “These are individuals who simply come right here for the summer time, spend their cash, and pay their fair proportion of taxes,” Donna Krueger-Simmons, gross sales agent with Mott & Chace Sotheby’s Worldwide in Watch Hill, Rhode Island, instructed CNBC. “They’re getting penalized simply because in addition they dwell some other place.”
“You’re simply hurting the individuals who help small enterprise,” Lori Joyal of the Lila Delman Compass workplace in Watch Hill, instructed CNBC. “You’re chasing away the individuals who spend a lot of the cash in these cities.”
Brokers worry that the tax might backfire on trip householders, who would possibly select to spend their cash on close by trip cities with much less stringent tax legal guidelines.
Different States Are Implementing Related Taxes
Montana
Montana not too long ago handed reforms set to take impact in 2026, which equally distinguish between major residences and long-term leases versus secondary/trip houses and short-term leases. The state skilled an inflow of recent residents from New York and different main cities in the course of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Montana’s new system would require non-primary residents and short-term rental house owners to pay a flat price of 1.90% starting in 2026, whatever the property worth. Nevertheless, houses used as major residences or for long-term leases can qualify for decrease, tiered charges, relying on market values, in line with the Montana Division of Income.
There are caveats to Montana’s program. Owners who dwell of their residences for not less than seven months of the 12 months, or have long-term leases, might qualify for lowered charges and a one-time rebate for 2025, in line with tax compliance website Avalara. The location additionally estimates that second houses and higher-value properties will bear a larger share of the tax burden on account of their greater tax charges.
Cape Cod, Massachusetts
Cape Cod is contemplating becoming a member of close by Rhode Island in taxing prosperous part-time residents. Nevertheless, relatively than an annual tax, Cape Cod will apply a “mansion tax” within the type of a 2% actual property switch tax on gross sales of over $2 million. Proponents argue that it might generate round $56 million yearly for reasonably priced and year-round housing.
Rob Brennan, chief authorized officer on the nonprofit group Housing Help, instructed Cape Cod’s native authorities web site:
“This is not a cyclical scarcity—it’s an existential disaster. With out a everlasting, predictable supply of funding, we can not help housing that working Cape Codders can really afford. There’s no means out of this disaster with out daring, systemic options. The $2,000,000 residence turning into $2,040,000 doesn’t cease second-home patrons.”
Conversely, full-time residents in Chatham, Cape Cod, will obtain a 35% property tax exemption as of July 1, 2026.
“The huge quantity of wealth on this city in residential property is held by a disproportionate quantity of people that aren’t residents of this city,” Chatham neighborhood board member Seth Taylor instructed the Cape Cod Chronicle. “I don’t suppose it’s an excessive amount of to ask to take a look at this as a sensible means to assist the middle-income people that we are saying we wish to have in our neighborhood.”
Chatham and 10 different communities on the Cape and islands, in addition to six different cities and cities throughout the state, together with Boston, have adopted a residential tax exemption.
California
Los Angeles’ “mansion tax,” often known as Measure ULA, imposes a 4% switch tax on property gross sales between $5 million and $10 million, and a 5.5% tax on gross sales above $10 million to help reasonably priced housing and homeless prevention applications. Nevertheless, the tax has not too long ago been below scrutiny and will be eradicated to encourage growth.
“It was bought as a mansion tax, which suggests massive homes for wealthy folks, but it surely really had a chilling impact on housing development, notably residences,” former Meeting Speaker Bob Hertzberg, who was tapped by Mayor Karen Bass to work out the small print of the legislative proposal, instructed the Los Angeles Occasions.
You may also like
Issues Quick-Time period Rental Homeowners Ought to Hold In Thoughts
When you personal a short-term rental in states like Rhode Island or Montana, you have to to pay explicit consideration to:
The variety of days you reside within the property personally as a major residence versus the times you lease it.
Hold data of residency use dates versus short-term and mid-term rental occupancy.
Weigh the earnings generated from the rental versus the tax payable by not occupying it to qualify for residency restrictions to calculate the most effective use of your property.
Last Ideas: Grey Areas
I’d by no means advocate discovering methods to bypass the brand new guidelines, however there are some grey areas that astute buyers might make the most of.
When you dwell in a piece of your property whereas additionally utilizing it as a short-term rental, your tax legal responsibility can be decided primarily based on the proportion of the home you occupy. In actuality, it’s unlikely that an IRS consultant will go to to confirm the apportioned use of your rental.
If sure areas, such because the kitchen and TV areas, are collectively used, their delineation turns into much more opaque. Throw ADUs, completed basements, and attics into the combination, and who lives in what components of the property presents an attention-grabbing proposition for an accountant who is aware of how far to bend the foundations.
Conversely, and fewer doubtless to attract consideration, is to merely ramp up your short-term earnings as a lot as attainable whereas making the most of renovation and depreciation tax deductions. Pay the brand new taxes as required, and revel in a great evening’s sleep.
