In fact, there are numerous variable elements to incorporate right here. Rotten Tomatoes, as an illustration, did not launch formally till 2000, and did not change into a exceptional cultural pressure till about 2003 or 2004. The positioning has extra critiques of newer movies than of older ones, which goes to weight approval scores. “Unusual New Worlds,” as an illustration, has 87 critiques, whereas “Star Trek: The Animated Sequence” (ranked third, with a 94% approval score) solely has 18. Additionally, a number of the newer reveals’ approval scores are primarily based solely on critiques of their first few episodes, and do not stand as an total litigation of the sequence in query, ex submit facto. The ’90s reveals have been judged as an entire, whereas “Unusual New Worlds” was judged by possibly 5 episodes.
“Star Trek: The Subsequent Era” was fourth on the RT record with a 91% approval score, whereas “Deep Area 9” nearly tied “Decrease Decks” with 91% approval, solely with fewer critiques.
Curiously, much less interesting Nu-Trek reveals like “Star Trek: Discovery” and “Star Trek: Picard” nonetheless garnered a number of optimistic response, not less than initially. “Picard” has an approval score of 89%, bringing it in at #7, whereas “Disco,” the primary Nu-Trek sequence, is in eighth with an 84. These reveals are hotly contested, and /Movie has gone on file as to why they do not work very nicely. Coming in behind them, somewhat bafflingly, was the unique 1966 “Star Trek” sequence, boasting a mere 80% approval. That’s primarily based on 42 critiques, although, a few of them classic.
On the backside of the record is “Star Trek: Voyager” (76%) at #10, and eventually, at #11, “Star Trek: Enterprise” (56%).
Nu-Trek reveals can brag about this: On common, they’ve a 91.8% approval. Followers of the 2 unique reveals can take solace within the data that their common is 87%, however ’90s Trek followers will probably be damage to be taught that their 4 reveals common out to 78.75%.
