Studying Time: 3 minutes
The feud between Drake and Kendrick Lamar boiled over final summer season when the A-list rappers started firing off diss tracks at each other at a livid price.
However the scenario got here to a head in February, when Kendrick took the stage for the Tremendous Bowl halftime present.
As anticipated, he carried out “Not Like Us,” essentially the most savage of his Drake-inspired diss tracks.
The tune had already been the topic of a Drake lawsuit in opposition to Common Music Group (which is each his label and Kendrick’s).
Drake alleges that the label pushed false pedophilia allegations by selling the tune.
He factors out that the Grammy-winning single resulted in a deluge of social media hate, and he even claims that it was the reason for a 2024 incident through which a safety guard was shot at Drake’s Toronto residence throughout an tried break-in.
Now, attorneys for Drake have submitted an amended grievance through which they particularly gripe about Kendrick’s halftime present, which was the most-watched in Tremendous Bowl historical past.
Drake’s authorized staff blasts Kendrick Lamar’s halftime present
“The Recording was carried out through the 2025 Tremendous Bowl and broadcast to the biggest viewers for a Tremendous Bowl halftime present ever, over 133 million folks, together with hundreds of thousands of youngsters, and hundreds of thousands extra who had by no means earlier than heard the tune or any of the songs that preceded it,” says a courtroom doc obtained by Web page Six.
It provides, “It was the primary, and can hopefully be the final, Tremendous Bowl halftime present orchestrated to assassinate the character of one other artist.”
Evidently, Drake and his attorneys aren’t messing round right here. And whereas artists are sometimes free to hurl insults at each other in tune type, this might transform a thorny case.
In any case, at one level within the tune, Kendrick labels Drake and his mates “licensed pedophiles,” which is nearly essentially the most damaging declare one could make.
“Drake’s amended grievance makes an already robust case stronger,” his lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, stated in an announcement. “Drake will expose the proof of UMG’s misconduct, and UMG might be held accountable for the results of its ill-conceived choices.”
Common’s response
In a scathing response, UMG alleges that Drake’s attorneys have manipulated the rapper into falsely believing he has a case.
“Drake, unquestionably one of many world’s most completed artists and with whom we’ve loved a 16-year profitable relationship, is being misled by his authorized representatives into taking one absurd authorized step after one other,” the corporate stated.
“It’s shameful that these silly and frivolous authorized theatrics proceed.”
It stays to be seen if the 2 events will ultimately sq. off in courtroom. However it appears apparent that essentially the most notorious hip hop feud in current reminiscence is much from over.
